<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bankruptcy trustee throws a wrench in stipulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevesbankruptcyblog.com/2009/02/17/bankruptcy-trustee-throws-a-wrench-in-stipulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevesbankruptcyblog.com/2009/02/17/bankruptcy-trustee-throws-a-wrench-in-stipulation/</link>
	<description>The Chronicles Of Our Bankruptcy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:58:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tea Gal</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesbankruptcyblog.com/2009/02/17/bankruptcy-trustee-throws-a-wrench-in-stipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Tea Gal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesbankruptcyblog.com/?p=194#comment-165</guid>
		<description>I gotta say, you&#039;re blog is good.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta say, you&#8217;re blog is good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Batt</title>
		<link>http://www.stevesbankruptcyblog.com/2009/02/17/bankruptcy-trustee-throws-a-wrench-in-stipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>C Batt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevesbankruptcyblog.com/?p=194#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Good points…I would note that as someone who really doesn’t write on blogs much (in fact, this may be my first post), I don’t think the term “lurker” is very becoming to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault really , but perhaps the blogosphere could come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that enjoy reading the posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points…I would note that as someone who really doesn’t write on blogs much (in fact, this may be my first post), I don’t think the term “lurker” is very becoming to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault really , but perhaps the blogosphere could come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that enjoy reading the posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
